The recent scandal around the mantra (OM) swung the crypt sphere and revived deep concerns about management and transparency in the active sector of the real world (RWA). But outside the storm, some actors like Realfin, see the opportunity in this crisis: to prove that another model is not only possible but necessary.
Mantra scandal: RWA project management warnings
The recent collapse of Mantra Token OM has returned concerns about RWA projects (real world assets). If it is a massive transmission of chips to a centralized platform, suspected of being organized by the founding team, in the context already stretched by the persistent criticism of the division of chips and the opacity of the project.
This operation acted as a catalyst and emphasized the main structural shortcomings: excessive centralization of the offer, lack of communication, lack of clear management mechanisms. This kind of crisis does not arise without warning signals. This reflects the accumulation of opaque decisions and undetected doubts.
For experienced observers, this incident recalls that confidence in RWA projects cannot be based on simple promises. It must be built on solid foundations: transparency, responsibility and shared administration.
Exclusive conversation – Realfin’s view of mantra and the future of RWA
Question: What did you really do with the token OM?
The massive transmission of tokens to a platform perceived as related to the team has launched panic. This autumn, however, reflects mainly collected concerns: lack of transparency, imbalance in distribution, defective communication. If the project leaves too much in tensioning questions, each signal becomes a critical warning.
Q: What are the risks of excessive concentration of chips?
This is the main problem, especially in the sector, such as RWA, which seeks to gain confidence in institutional capital. Too exposed team has an excessive, real or perceived influence that weakens the whole ecosystem. It is essential to think of balanced administration structures.
Question: How did communication problems deteriorate?
The project, which is not concerned with the concern of its community, which remains vague or missing at key moments, is exposed to a brutal reaction. The crypto market is emotional. The absence of transparency strengthens vulnerability.
Q: What lessons can be learned?
Rating: Predict. If the team converts tokens, it must publicly justify it. The transparency of jacket calendars, public portfolios and progressive decentralized administration is necessary for building confidence.
Q: Is the incident endangered the entire RWA sector?
No. This is not the end of the RWA, but a reminder of its requirements. The potential of these projects remains huge if you strengthen the foundations.
Q: Will this affair slow down the sector?
Maybe temporarily in terms of trust. In the long run, however, this will be perceived as an isolated case. Solid projects will appear from this crisis.
Q: What specific problems are RWA projects trying to solve?
In Credifi we fill in the emptiness of the financing of small and medium -sized enterprises, often ignored by banks. Other cases of use include token receivables, NFT trade bonds and international trade financing.
Question: How to overcome the obsession with a price at the expense of usefulness?
It is a challenge, but the change in mentality is changing. Institutional investors are increasingly preferred by the foundations: real yield, transparency, cash flow. Projects must remain on their mission.
Realfin: Model Integrity and Innovation in RWA
Realfin excels as a trusted and proactive alternative. His approach is based on three main pillars:
- Shared Administration: No entity can control the development of the protocol itself. The force is distributed to prevent centralized drifts.
- Transparency on-Svezec: Institutional portfolios, allowances and jackets are public and at any time traceable.
- Real anchoring: Realfin actively develops MSE solutions, NFT obligations and asset securization. Innovation is in the service of tangible cases of use.
Another differentiation initiative: Reading Reading (R2E) that rewards users for their educational obligation. A model that combines pedagogy, transparency and motivation.
The mantra’s fall does not sign the RWA failure, but emphasizes the urgency of the paradigm shift. Realfin embodies this necessary development: the development of responsible tokenized funding, auditable and turned to the real economy. And to understand this new generation of responsible actors, explore the reading program (R2E) to Realfin: Initiative that rewards your curiosity and your commitment!
Maximize your Cointribne experience with our “Read to Earn” program! For each article you read, get points and approach exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start to accumulate benefits.
The Cirtribnian editorial team connects its votes to express themselves on topics specific to cryptocurrencies, investments, metavers and NFT, trying to best answer your questions.
The provisions of unwavering:
The content and products listed on this page are in no way approved by Cointtribunian and should not be interpreted as responsibility.
Cointribune seeks to communicate all available information to the readers, but cannot guarantee its accuracy and exhaustion. We invite the reader to find out before any event concerning the company and also take full responsibility for their decision. This article cannot be considered as investment advice, offer or invitation to purchase all products or services.
Investments in digital financial assets include risks.
Read more
